Posted on March 27, 2012 by Yoram Gat
The Huffington Post has an article which mixes some standard issue techno-progressivist messages with a rejection of elections and a proposal of government by policy juries:
Jim Gilliam, CEO and co-founder of NationBuilder, […] and his co-founders Jesse Haff and Joe Green created the service to help people organize their own communities. As Gilliam said in the first part of our interview, he sees the primary political divide in our country not as one of “left vs. right. The divide is the people vs. the powerful.” This is something that Gilliam sees as not standing for long in an age of instantaneous, ubiquitous communication.
“The internet will reset all of that,” said Gilliam. “There’s no question it has to, because the internet has this really difficult relationship with power. I have deep emotional issues with power, and I believe that the way to deal with it is to give it to everybody. The biggest way to destroy it is that everybody has it. So build tools so that you can build your power base. and everybody wants that. That’s the currency of 21st century, it’s less all the money you have and it’s more how big your nation is.”
[…]
“My feeling is that the future of politics doesn’t have any elections in it. […]”
“No elections” runs against the grain of the way we currently think of democracy. Yet our own system already contains the framework of what Gilliam sees as a better, more participatory solution that addresses the issues of corruption and ignorance that he sees as plaguing our current democracy.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Press, Proposals, Sortition | 6 Comments »
Posted on March 21, 2012 by Yoram Gat
The Australian Daily Telegraph reports:
The buck will stop with you – people power council
More than 1,500 people will be randomly asked to take part in a panel to set the agenda for how Canada Bay council should spend, service and plan its four-year budget.
It puts into practice an idea from independent research body newDemocracy Foundation that a random selection of citizens has the least direct self interest in public decisions.
NewDemocracy Foundation executive director Iain Walker said the randomly selected panel was similar to a jury – only for public decision making instead.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Initiatives, Press, Sortition | 14 Comments »
Posted on March 4, 2012 by Yoram Gat
The Reading Eagle reports:
Using a lottery to name the members of a citizen legislature would make that legislature more truly representative of the population and uncouple the link between money and the influence it buys in elections.
That was part of a message David Grant delivered to 17 people gathered Saturday in the Reading Friends Meetinghouse.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Athens, History, Press, Sortition | Leave a comment »
Posted on February 23, 2012 by Yoram Gat
Martina Devlin writes in the Irish Independent:
[T]he Constitution, which forms the basis of our self-government as a people, definitely needs an overhaul. Not some tinkering, but the level of in-depth, bonnet-to-boot servicing a vintage Rolls-Royce dating back to 1937 could expect.
The decision to use significant citizen input into this exercise is a welcome approach, and the Government deserves credit for reserving two-thirds of the 99 available seats for citizens.
It’s these 66 citizens who interest me, rather than the political figures assigned to the remaining 33 places. The success of the constitutional convention, and the level of popular support it attracts, hinges on who is chosen to join the Class of 66. Handpicked individuals who can be relied on to play follow-the-leader or slip into someone else’s version of the green jersey won’t fit the bill. We need transparency in the selection process.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Athens, Press, Sortition | 21 Comments »
Posted on February 14, 2012 by Yoram Gat
Quirky hopefuls liven up French presidential race
(Reuters) – From a peroxide-blonde stripper who wants to get bankers meditating to a Rastafarian advocating tantrism as a national religion, a string of colorful outsiders are vying for a place in France’s 2012 presidential election.
One wants to bring back the monarchy, another says leaders should be picked by lottery and a third is a clown who doesn’t actually have any campaign proposals.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Athens, Elections, Press, Sortition | 21 Comments »
Posted on February 2, 2012 by Yoram Gat
A story in the Irish University Observer leads to an organization called “We the People“. The organization is apparently led by a group of politicians and academics.
The organization held a meeting of randomly selected people (“citizen’s assembly”) over a weekend in which various policy issues were discussed. The general structure seems very similar to that of a Fishkin DP – a limited, pre-defined scope; a term measured in days; expert opinion presented; small group discussions alternating with large group sessions.
The organization released a report in December. It describes the process as follows:
We the Citizens was a pilot project to test whether a more participatory form of democracy could work in Ireland. The model tested was a Citizens’ Assembly, which is a form of deliberative democracy.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Participation, Press, Proposals, Sortition | 2 Comments »
Posted on January 20, 2012 by Yoram Gat
An article regarding “participative budgeting” in Calgary makes good material for critical reading. Among other issues, random selection is mentioned:
It’s not enough to simply invite citizens to give input, she [Victoria councillor Lisa Helps] argued. The problem is that special-interest groups can too easily dominate the discussion.
Dan Doherty, a director with a non-profit called Wise Democracy, has already tested one possible solution.
In 2011, he was contracted by the city to build “citizens insight councils” tasked with giving input into the city’s official community planning process. He found participants through a random selection process.
By calling 60 people, selected randomly by address, Doherty found 24 willing participants who agreed to a half-day workshop.
“It gets at people whose voices are not usually heard,” said Doherty.
Following up on “Wise Democracy” yielded their website, with a table explaining how the Wise Democracy process is differentiated from other “deliberative democracy” processes.
Filed under: Participation, Press, Sortition | 1 Comment »
Posted on January 16, 2012 by Yoram Gat
Lois Kazakoff, Chronicle Columnist, writes:
Concerned by California’s faltering government, a coalition of eight nonprofit good government groups conducted an experiment in June. They invited 435 Californians of every stripe from every corner of the state, from every political persuasion to spend three days in a Torrance hotel deliberating 30 proposals for government reform. The coalition raised $1 million to cover their travel costs.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Athens, Ballot measures, Opinion polling, Press, Proposals, Sortition | 8 Comments »
Posted on January 14, 2012 by Yoram Gat
D.G. Martin, the host UNC-TV’s “North Carolina Bookwatch,” writes:
There has to be a better way.
Some of us reached that conclusion after discussing the mess our congressional and legislative governing systems have come to.
[…]
How could we find a system that frees our elective representatives from the servitude of full-time fundraising, from the draining of energy and spirit that go with permanent campaigns, and from the tribal commitments to political caucuses and parties? How could we free them from these things so they could spend full time working on legislation to make our state and nation better?
Somebody asked, what about a lottery? Why not just select our representatives by lottery?
That suggestion sounded like a joke. At first.
Continue reading →
Filed under: Athens, Press, Sortition | 4 Comments »
Posted on January 7, 2012 by tbouricius
The English version of the French web site “Books and Ideas” has an interview with Loïc Blondiaux about the increasingly apparent undemocratic nature of traditional electoral democracy. He says in part…
Elections do not always determine new directions, but they allow retroactive democratic oversight. So, in my opinion, there can be no democracy without elections, but a democracy in which, in addition to elections, random selection is practiced along with other forms of consultation and public debate, would start to resemble a real democracy.
Filed under: Press, Sortition | 18 Comments »